Showing posts with label MD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MD. Show all posts

The true cost of physician turnover at healthcare facilities, analyzed by Dr. William Matzner, MD, PhD

The true cost of physician turnover at healthcare facilities, analyzed by Dr. William Matzner, MD, PhD



There are many costs involved with recruiting and retaining medical staff. HR experts project a cost factor of 16% to 20% of the physician’s annual salary purely as replacement costs, notes Dr. William Matzner in his analysis.

Just like in any business, it is prudent for a medical clinic to retain physicians over long periods of time. Uncontrolled turnover is costly not just in real dollars, but also in staff morale, patient retention and patient satisfaction. Although medicine may be practiced universally, each clinic and office has its own way of seeing patients, documenting findings, doing and reporting labs and x-rays and after-hours coverage. Those factors are always affected negatively when a “replacement” physician is interjected into the mix.

Dr. William Matzner, MD, based in California, provides his insights in a review article. Dr. Matzner is a recognized expert in Healthcare and Neuro Economics. He has conducted extensive research in and taught Cost Effectiveness Analysis, a methodology he utilizes to evaluate and recommend corporate health and wellness programming predicated on achieving targeted and desired programming and outcomes for organizations.

There are many costs involved with recruiting and retaining medical staff. But focusing just on productivity, it takes time to train the physician in the specific logistics of the practice, and decreases in productivity while the new physician is familiarizing themselves with how the clinic is operated. Generally speaking, HR experts project a cost factor of 16% to 20% of the physician’s annual salary purely as replacement costs. Add to that number recruiter and interviewing costs, and a $200,000 internist can easily cost $65,000 to replace and onboard.

But this is just what you might consider the direct costs. The indirect costs include, for example, staff upheaval (physicians often create close bonds with staff.) Also, a physician departure, depending on the reasons, may cause other staff to depart as well. Further, depending on the clinic patient structure, you may actually lose patients or at best, have to deal with disgruntled patients. What is the value, the cost, of these issues? More importantly, are you building them in to the cost of replacing a physician?

Moreover, and this is the elephant in the room, do you build them into the cost of retaining a physician? Recruitment and retention run hand-in-hand, but too often cost is based simply on the known directs: recruiter and relocation fees. The perspective I’ve seen too often is that other doctors will take over seeing the departing physician’s patients, so we’re not losing anything, right? Wrong.

When you build a model that measures and values ancillary staff turnover attributable to a physician departure or recruitment, that measures and values lost or unhappy patients, and then add in the recruitment and productivity costs, you will arrive at a very important number – the value of keeping physicians, of reducing turnover and possibly the understanding of the value of adding monies to your retention budget.

In order to retain physicians a clinic may need to offer more time off, less after-hours coverage and shorter hours. A critical analysis may prove these and other retention initiatives are less costly than turnover. Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a unique and clever method for analyzing this problem. Using decision tree models, and assigning not only cost but effectiveness data to the model, it will be possible to make a more informed decision as to how to recruit physicians and what economic and non-economic incentives to offer them in order to create an actual recruitment and retention program rather than just a recruitment program.

If your objective is to provide the best decision-making for your organization and take a global view of your business, expanding your sights beyond ROI, and educating other decision-makers, Cost Effectiveness Analysis can make your organization more competitive and more profitable.

*** William Lee Matzner, MD., is a recognized expert in Healthcare and Neuro Economics. With a Ph.D. in Economics, MBA and Medical Doctor degree, Dr. William L. Matzner will provide you with expert analysis on health and wellness programming, populations health management, disease management, new program development, facility development, equipment acquisitions, and other healthcare programs, acquisitions and initiatives. For more information about cost effectiveness analysis and improved financial accountability for your organization, visit Dr. Matzner at http://healthcareanalytics.biz. Dr. Matzner is also available for speaking engagements, retreat presentations and topic specific addresses.

Consulting Website: https://healthcareanalytics.biz
Website: https://drwilliammatzner.com         
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

William Matzner, MD (Simi Valley, California), has been practicing medicine since 1989, Internal Medicine and Reproductive Immunology. M.D. with Honors from Baylor College of Medicine.

Measuring the Effectiveness of Health and Wellness Programs using Cost Effectiveness Analysis, by William Matzner, MD


Measuring the Effectiveness of Health and Wellness Programs using Cost Effectiveness Analysis

William L. Matzner, MD, PhD, MBA FACHE, FACP

Overview

Health and Wellness programs that appeared in the corporate world two tot three decades ago were considered more an employee perk than a focused effort to change behaviors and influence health and performance factors. However, various emerging trends and solid research data have r led corporations over the last several years to look at employee health and wellness an investment in worker productivity, staff retention and an opportunity to directly impact utilization and cost of a growing healthcare cost liability. It seems intuitive that a workforce which does not smoke, is not overweight, participates in exercise programs,  and eats healthy will perform more efficiently and cost the corporation less in term of fewer sick days and lower healthcare costs . But how does a corporation go from a generally good idea to implementing a program which has real costs, but conversely has the potential to foster even more significantly real cost benefits.

Current Situation

Measuring real cost and value has presented considerable challenges to health and wellness professionals and consultants in the industry. Some programs have attempted to use Return on Investment calculations (ROI) to help in decision making. ROI by definition is Net Profit/Investment (gain from investment-cost of investment)/cost of investment. While at first this calculation seems simple and straight-forward, there are many pitfalls in using this calculation, which was really designed for investment in property, manufacturing equipment, and other capital acquisitions or expenditures.

Opportunity

The use of Cost Effectiveness analysis, a branch of decision analysis, can likely be used to produce more useful and actionable data and information. In this analysis, one sets up a decision tree model to determine a treatment choice, or in this case a wellness program choice, and directly chart how its costs and benefits affect the decision. In this technique, we investigate and quantify the costs of certain interventions and their outcomes. One can also include opportunity costs (the cost of not doing something) in the model. The benefit is typically measured in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years which is not only the benefit of living one year longer, but living it in a quality and enjoyable manner. Techniques have been developed to quantify this, and from a corporate perspective, it may be correlated directly to cost associated with various employee outcomes or actions, such as productivity, absenteeism, turnover, or other such factors as the organization may measure or choose to measure in the future

In this example, one can evaluate the effectiveness of a standard treatment for a tumor versus a new treatment. The costs are in the numerator (dollars), and the effectiveness in the denominator (usually representing quality adjusted life years).  The best choice is the branch with the lowest ratio (cost/effectiveness)—here the Standard Treatment arm that Eradicates the Tumor.  Likewise, we could use the cost of a particular Health and Wellness Program and model how changes in health will affect the costs and benefits to the workforce at the organization. The model can be as simple or as complex as one wishes to model it. It can directly visualize how much an organization may wish to invest in a wellness program in order to get desired benefits. Although my example is a model of different treatments for diseases, the analogy is that a particular intervention in a corporate health and wellness program is a type of treatment that can actually impact health for the employees.

The benefit of this type of analysis lies in its flexibility.  Although general programs for corporate health and wellness exist in many organizations, the specific programs are dictated by a combination of the desire of the employee population and the desires and needs of the corporation. Benefits can include healthier employees who can work more efficiently and effectively while at work, and have less time off for illness. It can also give the employee a sense of belonging to the organization, which can have secondary beneficial effects for the organization.  Such benefits can be incorporated into the model in the denominator as a form of quality in the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) measurement.  A survey could be conducted of the employees in a specific organization to determine what is most important to them and even quantify just how important each benefit could be.

From the perspective of the organization itself, there are numerous potential benefits to the corporation.  Healthier employee populations can work for longer periods of time and more efficiently. Furthermore, they would have less sick days off which are in effect an opportunity cost (cost of not having someone at work). This can further correlate to lower health insurance premiums if statistically fewer employees are making claims. This is a definite direct cost savings for corporations participating in health and wellness programs. A model could be constructed to incorporate the premium costs to the organizations in two scenarios: one with a particular wellness program and one without.   The difference in cost savings can guide the organization in how much they could spend on a program and still be ahead from a cost/benefit perspective.

Another issue arises as to the time horizon for both investment and at what point the organization can see beneficial effects from their investment in a particular wellness program. One problem that employers have a difficult time visualizing when considering a wellness program is the length of time it will take to see a difference.  In general, most corporate wellness programs will say that it will take 2-3 years to see a difference.  Using CE analysis, one can actually track the benefits over specific time periods. Furthermore, there are advanced modeling techniques that can simulate the course of chronic debilitating diseases over time. These models will incorporate the probability that something will happen as a percentage of certainty per year, and then it iterates the probability over X number of years to give one an accurate idea of the cumulative effect of a disease outcome over time. This capability is not at all possible using ROI or VOI calculations.  Since many common health problems that can affect the corporation fall into this category (heart disease, lung disease such as COPD, smoking, obesity), cost effectiveness analysis is the only accurate way to model the outcome of such diseases and the benefits of intervening through corporate health and wellness programs.

Conclusion

In assessing the costs and benefits of corporate health and wellness programming and strategies, an organization may begin with a record review of healthcare expenditures to gather a picture of current healthcare utilization and the determination of interventional points of opportunity. A second step would be to survey the work force based both on demographics and behaviors, as determined important by the corporate health and wellness director. This process will develop data points that may be used to then create the type of analysis presented here. 

As a result, this type of analysis can guide the corporate health and wellness director in deciding which of the many programs that are presented would be worth implementing. And it provides the executive team with highly quantifiable data from which to make effective economically sound employee benefit decisions.


About William L. Matzner, M.D., PhD, FACP

Dr. William Matzner works in the area of healthcare economics consulting at Healthcare Analytics, LLC, in California. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Stanford University. He received his M.D. with Honors from Baylor College of Medicine. In 1988, he was the Solomon Scholar for Resident Research at Cedar Sinai Medical Center. Dr. Matzner subsequently was awarded a PhD in Neuro Economics from Claremont Graduate University. He is board certified in Internal Medicine and Palliative Medicine. He has researched and published extensively on the issue of reproduction and immunology in medical literature. He has been in private practice since 1989, specializing in Reproductive Immunology and Internal medicine.

Consulting Website: http://healthcareanalytics.biz
 

William Matzner, MD (Simi Valley, California), has been practicing medicine since 1989, Internal Medicine and Reproductive Immunology. M.D. with Honors from Baylor College of Medicine.

Featured Blog Article

New Review of Cost Effectiveness of Bundled Payments

  Dr. William Matzner, Simi Valley, California The cost of healthcare continues to be a topic of intense discussion from kitchen tables...